The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Last call comments
At 09:15 27/06/2000 -0700, Eric Gray wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Here's most of my last call comments. More may >> be sent out later this evening. > >And here they are. > >> >> >> SPECIFIC COMMENTS >> ================= >> > > The redefinitions of E-LSP and L-LSP are - as >Grenville has already pointed out (comments 3 & 4) >- not too useful. If there is a reason for including >all of this, it would make sense to abstract those >portions that are repeated in sections 3.1 and 4.1 >(almost all of the text) into a section that specifies >stuff relating to any kind of DiffServ LSP and just >list the E-LSP and L-LSP specific stuff in sections >3.1 and 4.1. I am not too sure what the authors had >hoped to specify in this text, so I can not be sure >there is a reason for including it. We've already discussed this and have a proposal on how to adress this. > > I also agree with Grenville's comments 13 and 14 >and add to his first comment that - like the Uniform >model - ECN needs either to be better documented or >not included. If there were a relatively mature draft >that stated how ECN would be done using the EXT bits, >then it is obvious that this draft would have to address >how its usage of the EXT bits can be coordinated with >the ECN usage. As it now is, this section seems to be >trying to establish backward compatibility with some >non-existant function. > We've already discussed this and have a proposal on how to adress this. >Aditional acronyms: > >AF Assured Forwarding >CE Congestion Experienced (not needed if section 11 is removed) >CLP Cell Loss Priority >COPS Common Open Policy Service [ref RFC 2748] >CS (?) >DE Discard Eligibility >DF Default Forwarding (?) >ECN Explicit Congestion Notification >ECT (? - not needed if section 11 is removed) >EF Expedited Forwarding >SNMP Simple Network Management Protocol > thanks >> >> NITS >> ==== >> > >toward top of page 36, "An RSVP router that does >recognizes the DIFFSERV ..." should be changed to >"... that does recognize ...". You might also >change "RSVP router" to "LSR" since "RSVP" is >implied by the sectional context. > >several more occurences of 'eg.' (search and >replace?)... > fine. >> >> > _________________________________________________________________ Francois Le Faucheur Development Engineer, IOS Layer 3 Services Cisco Systems Office Phone: +33 4 92 96 75 64 Home Office Phone: +33 4 92 94 00 78 Mobile : +33 6 89 108 159 Vmail: +33 1 58 04 62 66 Fax: +33 4 92 96 79 08 Email: flefauch@cisco.com _________________________________________________________________ Petra B - Les Lucioles - 291, rue Albert Caquot - 06560 Valbonne - France _________________________________________________________________
|
|