The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-05.txt comments
Bora, Could you please identify why/how a node could understand the Diffserv object and the E-LSP C-type and still can't support the signaled E-LSP. -Shahram >-----Original Message----- >From: Bora Akyol [mailto:akyol@pluris.com] >Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 3:45 PM >To: Shahram Davari >Cc: 'Puneet Agarwal'; 'mpls@uu.net' >Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-05.txt comments > > >Shahram >Comments within. > >Shahram Davari wrote: > >> Puneet, >> >> Please see my comments: >> > ><<snipped>> > >> >4) pg 36, 5th paragraph: when a LSR can only support preconfigured >> >EXP <--> PHB mapping, if someone wants to set up the per label >> >EXP <--> PHB >> >mapping, what error should the LSR return? Hopefully this >error code is >> >different than "Diff-Serv Error" to differentiate it from invalid >> >EXP <--> PHB mapping. >> >> As mentioned in section 5.3, two scenarios may exist: >> >> 1) In case the node only supports configured E-LSP, the node does not >> recognize Diffserv object at all -> "Unknown Object Error" >> >> 2) In case the node supports configured E-LSP and L-LSP, The >node does not >> recognize C-type = 1 (Signaled E-LSP) -> "Unknown Object C-type" >> > >Why not have another error code for nodes that understand the >DS object but can >not provide per-label context. This makes sense to me. > > >> >> Regards, >> -Shahram >> >> > >> >-Puneet >> > > >
|
|