The MPLS WG Archive

[Grenville Armitage <gja@dnrc.bell-labs.com>]

I'm in the process of writing my own comments on this I-D,
but in case I forget I want to concur with Bora here. The
section on ECN isn't necessary, and detracts from this document's
focus as a normative spec on diffserv mappings. It is sufficient
to note that use of ECN concepts might involve borrowing
EXP bits, but that additional discussion is outside the scope 
of draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-05.txt.

cheers,
gja

Bora Akyol wrote:
> 
> More comments to follow, but for now, can we please take out section 11
> related to ECN bits out of this draft. I think ECN handling is
> completely outside the scope of this draft and section 11 does not do a
> good enough job of discussing it.
> 
> Bora Akyol

-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Grenville Armitage                    http://members.home.net/garmitage/
Bell Labs Research Silicon Valley