The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Jun> msg00464



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Question on draft-kompella-lsp-hierarchy-00.txt

  • From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:57:59 -0700
  • cc: mpls@UU.NET

Rohit,

> In the section 5.1, it is suggested that Path/Resv message
> should be encapsulated in another IP header if sent
> as unicast over the control plane. Can you please
> clarify why is this required?

See below....
  
> It should be possible to send the Resv message as it is.

Agreed.

> Path message can be sent without router alert to the
> next hop IP address. In this case, IP address of the tail
> end of the FA-LSP.

Agreed.

We'll correct the text in the next iteration of this document.

Yakov.