The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Jun> msg00453



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Bandwidth reservation per PSC

  • From: "Darek Skalecki" <dareks@nortelnetworks.com>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:15:05 -0400
  • CC: "'Francois Le Faucheur'" <flefauch@cisco.com>, alchiu@research.att.com, "'mpls'" <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Organization: Nortel

Actually what is currently defined for advertizement is bandwidth
availability by priority not resource/color/class/class-type.

Francois: I would be interested in working on class-type extensions to
IGPs. Let me know how I can contribute, maybe I can review what you are
going to propose.

Thanks,

Darek

Metz, E.T. wrote:

> Hi,
>
> isn't this already included in the current drafts? I thought there were
> resource classes defined. This may not match with the PSC though.
>
> In general, when (if) some form of classes are available, wouldn't it be
> more efficient to map new types of classes to these? Instead of defining
> extensions for new types of classes.
>
> Just some thoughts.
>
> cheers,
>         Eduard
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Francois Le Faucheur [mailto:flefauch@cisco.com]
> > Sent: woensdag 21 juni 2000 16:48
> > To: alchiu@research.att.com
> > Cc: 'Darek Skalecki'; 'mpls'; 'Francois Le Faucheur'
> > Subject: RE: Bandwidth reservation per PSC
> >
> >
> > Darek,
> > I am hoping to submit something on extensions to IGPs for
> > support of "Class-types". Let me know if you're interested in
> > working on this.
> > Francois
> >
> >