The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] CR-LDP timer
--- Yangguang Xu <xuyg@lucent.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > See my further question below, > > > It runs on TCP, which provides this garuntee. > Incase > > response is not received the TCP times out. Much > like > > T301 etc. > > What happens if TCP session is still OK, however > CR-LDP messages are lost at > some place, for example, the CR-LDP code drops > messages mistakenly? Anything can This is exactly the reliability redundancy I was talking about. These assumption are made in the erstwhile TELCO current B-ISDN world. But really if you look at it, its a Byzantine problem. How many levels of reliability you could use and should use are two different things. I am not saying to assume that packets can be dropped between TCP and LDP is right or wrong. But I do know that this assumption is not made in datacom world. > happen. Are we sure TCP is enough? Also do we have > time requirement for CR-LSP > setup? Any requirement from service provider? > > > A couple of points to remember are : > > 1. Q.2931 is a UNI i/f where message from > > one user (caller) are carried by the network > > ( through possibly multiple hps ) to the second > > user ( receiver). > > > > LDP is not like that it is really Peer to Peer. > > So protection for individual calls is not > really > > required. ( Although it would be desirable for > > some other purpose ) > > > > 2. Typically TELCO protocols have more reliability > > redundancy built into the stack than datacom > world. > > > > First, I guess I should say PNNI. Q.2931 is UNI although message set it reused at PNNI. > > Second, datacom equipment is moving to core. MPLS is > defined mainly for core > network. Reliability should be as important as Telco. I guess again we are comparing the assumption made by two different kind of network technologies. One more thing I may add, is that a session between two LDP peers is really like a call in B-ISDN world. Thus protecting it using on TCP timer seems fine, although not very desirable in all the cases. ===== I am willing to learn, if you care to teach. I am willing to teach, if you care to learn. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com |
|