The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] "This is a gripe" [was Re: [Diffserv] MPLS Diffserv Extensions related questions/comments
Kimmo.Raatikainen@nokia.com wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: EXT Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian@hursley.ibm.com] > > Sent: 02. June 2000 0:39 > > To: Bora Akyol > > Cc: diffserv@ietf.org; 'mpls@uu.net' > > Subject: Re: "This is a gripe" [was Re: [Diffserv] MPLS Diffserv > > Extensions related questions/comments > > > > > > Bora, > > > > I don't think we will see reports of Diffserv deployment > > experience until > > production releases from major router vendors support Diffserv. > > > > The edge boxes that I'm thinking of will need to do MF > > classification and shaping > > at LAN speeds (whatever that means in a particular year). > > Other boxes only need > > to do BA classification and policing. > > > > But this is old ground that we settled in the early days of > > diffserv. And > > I don't see what it has to do with MPLS. > > > > Brian > > > Please keep in mind that gigabit cards are already available. In our > experiments we have found out that a high-end PC running Linux can send at a > rate of 250-300 megabits per second using TCP/UDP. Of course. Edge boxes will need to support a gigabit. The server itself may function as the diffserv edge box; this is already possible at 100 Mbit/s. I would expect to see MF classifiers running at a gigabit soon enough. My concern is to keep the job of core boxes that do IP direct over photons as simple as possible, and I don't think we should ask them to do more than BA classification. Brian Brian
|
|