The MPLS WG Archive

[Bala Rajagopalan <braja@alpha.tellium.com>]

Hello:

You are absolutely right. The abstract states that the draft relates
to ongoing work and that the draft will evolve as work progresses
in OIF. In any case, the disclaimer you state is very true. We'll
include it in the next version.

Regards,

Bala



Jonathan Lang wrote:

> Bala,
>   In reading this draft (draft-bala-mpls-optical-uni-signaling-00.txt), I
> came to the conclusion that a lot of people will assume these are OIF
> APPROVED concepts/requirements for the optical UNI.  Since I attend the
> Signaling and Architecture groups of the OIF, I am only aware that the UNI
> signaling requirements are a Work In Progress and nothing has been APPROVED
> yet.
>   I am concerned that as the draft stands, it gives the impression that
> these are APPROVED requirements.
>   The draft needs to be modified to explicitly state that "not all of the
> concepts/requirements have been approved by the OIF".  Furthermore, once the
> requirements are APPROVED by the OIF, they should probably be communicated
> through a formal liaison from the OIF to the IETF.
>
> Regards,
> Jonathan
>
> Calient Networks
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    Part 1.2    Type: application/ms-tnef
>            Encoding: base64

--

Bala Rajagopalan
Tellium, Inc.
2 Crescent Place
P.O. Box 901
Oceanport, NJ 07757-0901
Tel: (732) 923-4237
Fax: (732) 923-9804
Email: braja@tellium.com