The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Process has been circumvented again
Eric, Lou will have a definitive answer, but I think it is most interesting in the VoMPLS world where each packet may be small (16 byte?) and the headers (IP, RTP, MPLS) become very significant. Adrian -- Adrian Farrel mailto:af@datcon.co.uk Network Convergence Group Data Connection Ltd., Chester, UK http://www.datcon.co.uk/ Tel: +44 (0) 1244 313440 Fax: +44 (0) 1244 312422 >-----Original Message----- >From: Eric Rosen [mailto:erosen@cisco.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 10:01 PM >To: Lou Berger >Cc: Eric Gray; George Swallow (E-mail); 'Vijay Srinivasan'; >MPLS Mailing >List (E-mail) >Subject: Re: Process has been circumvented again > > > >I wasn't in Adelaide so I can't comment on what might have >happened there. >But I would be interested in knowing why MPLS header >compression is deemed >useful. > >Header compression is generally used only on lower speed >links. Are you >envisioning the use of MPLS for traffic engineering on >low-speed links, or >are you worried about supporting VPNs over a low-speed backbone? >
|
|