The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Jul> msg00259



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Process has been circumvented again

  • From: Adrian Farrel <AF@datcon.co.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:34:45 +0100
  • Cc: Eric Gray <EGray@zaffire.com>, "George Swallow (E-mail)" <swallow@cisco.com>, "'Vijay Srinivasan'" <Vijay.Srinivasan@cosinecom.com>, "MPLS Mailing List (E-mail)" <mpls@UU.NET>

Eric,

Lou will have a definitive answer, but I think it is most interesting in the
VoMPLS world where each packet may be small (16 byte?) and the headers (IP,
RTP, MPLS) become very significant.

Adrian

--
Adrian Farrel  mailto:af@datcon.co.uk
Network Convergence Group
Data Connection Ltd., Chester, UK
http://www.datcon.co.uk/
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 313440  Fax: +44 (0) 1244 312422


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Rosen [mailto:erosen@cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 10:01 PM
>To: Lou Berger
>Cc: Eric Gray; George Swallow (E-mail); 'Vijay Srinivasan'; 
>MPLS Mailing
>List (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Process has been circumvented again 
>
>
>
>I wasn't in  Adelaide so I can't comment on what  might have 
>happened there.
>But I would  be interested in knowing why MPLS  header 
>compression is deemed
>useful.  
>
>Header compression  is generally  used only on  lower speed 
>links.   Are you
>envisioning the use  of MPLS for traffic engineering  on 
>low-speed links, or
>are you worried about supporting VPNs over a low-speed backbone? 
>