The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt
George, On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 01:20:49PM -0400, George Swallow wrote: > Rahul - > > > It will be nice to hear from the authors what their reasons/motivations are > > for making this change. > > We removed the 'PoP' operator at the time of the wg last call. It was > not well defined and no one had a use for it. A label stack would be > required with that. Once that was removed the label stack became a > mechanism with no procedures or uses defined. That seems only to be a > recipe for encouraging non-interoperability. > > Further folks working on the optical extensions, particularly > forwarding adjacnecies, found that they had no need of attempting to > set up more than one level of 'labeling' at a time. > > So we removed it. > > If someone comes forward with a genuine, well defined need, it's a > very simple matter to add another C-type to allow a stack. Thanks for the clarification. This seems reasonable. > > ...George > > ================================================================== > George Swallow Cisco Systems (978) 244-8143 > 250 Apollo Drive > Chelmsford, Ma 01824 >
|
|