The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Jul> msg00132



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt

  • From: "Ganesh Murugesan" <ganesh@laurelnetworks.com>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:54:27 -0400
  • Cc: <mpls@UU.NET>
  • Importance: Normal

Adrian,

I agree the single level label specifies that only one label can be
signaled.
My point is then RSVP-TE has nothing to do with Label Stacking and that line
of text shouldn't be there.

thanks
ganesh


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Adrian
> Farrel
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 9:45 AM
> To: Laurel - Ganesh Murugesan; Rahul Aggarwal; George Swallow
> Cc: mpls@UU.NET
> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt
>
>
> Oops.  now sending the entire message!
>
>
> This appears to bring RSVP into line with CR-LDP so that only one level of
> label can be signaled.
>
> Label stacking is not prevented by this approach, it simply narrows the
> options towards the commonly implemented ways of label stacking
> (for example
> signaling down the tunnel).
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
> --
> Adrian Farrel  mailto:af@datcon.co.uk
> Network Convergence Group
> Data Connection Ltd., Chester, UK
> http://www.datcon.co.uk/
> Tel: +44 (0) 1244 313440  Fax: +44 (0) 1244 312422
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Laurel - Ganesh Murugesan
> >Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 2:02 PM
> >To: Rahul Aggarwal; George Swallow
> >Cc: mpls@UU.NET
> >Subject: RE: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Rahul
> >> Aggarwal
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:07 PM
> >> To: George Swallow
> >> Cc: Rahul Aggarwal; mpls@UU.NET
> >> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> George,
> >> Thanks for the comments. I have a couple of inline comments:
> >>
> >> Also I just realized that the new draft has limited the contents
> >> of the label
> >> object to a single label, rather than a stack of labels. What is
> >> the reason
> >> for this limitation?
> >>
> >
> >====> But Section 1.1 Background 2nd paragraph says
> >      "Label stacking is also supported."
> >
> >thanks
> >ganesh
> >
>