The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Dec> msg00424



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Concerns regarding ...

  • From: Juha Heinanen <jh@lohi.eng.telia.fi>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:10:07 +0200 (EET)
  • Cc: danny@ambernetworks.com, mpls@UU.NET

Eric Gray writes:

 >     What goes against the I-D process is the idea of trying
 > to word-smith an I-D a full year after last call. 

just set the record straigth, i brought the problems up more than a
full year ago when i believe we still were in the last call process:

  From: Juha Heinanen <jh@lohi.eng.telia.fi>
  Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:45:52 +0200
  Subject: bridging over mpls
  ...
  the mpls label stack encoding i-d should be edited to explicitly allow
  mpls packets to carry anything.

-- juha