The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Dec> msg00413



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

Concerns regarding the numerous layer violations in baseMPLS drafts

  • From: Ben Black <ben@layer8.net>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:17:27 -0800
  • Cc: mpls@UU.NET
  • User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:15:53PM -0800, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
> 
> Also, the point is not to re-organise the documents.  I'll depart from
> Ben in that treating IP specially in IETF documents is perfectly valid,
> and need not be relegated to an appendix or new document.  However,
> some new wording is needed (IMHO).
> 

I'll concede this.  My real issue is the close intertwining of a 
specific protocol to the definition of MPLS.  If that were resolved
while keeping a single document, then I would be satisfied.



Ben