The MPLS WG Archive

Cell Relay Retreat>MPLS WG Archive>month:2000-Dec> msg00356



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]  
  [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index]

[Isis-wg] Question on DCC Architecture

  • From: John Harper <jharper@cisco.com>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:09:39 +0000
  • Cc: Mike Truskowski <truskows@cisco.com>, prz@net4u.ch (Tony Przygienda), Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com, james.d.carlson@east.sun.com, azinin@cisco.com, tli@procket.com, echang@pocketmail.com, isis-wg@spider.juniper.net, skatukam@cisco.com, mpls@UU.NET

Not true - there are BIG security advantages to not having is-is over ip. 
It rules
out a huge class of spoofing attacks to which OSPF is vulnerable. Further,
there are no evident advantages to having is-is over ip, at least not that I
have ever heard of.

         John

At 08:06 19/12/2000 -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
>there are small security advantages to NOT having is-is over ip
>
>randy
>_______________________________________________
>Isis-wg mailing list  -  Isis-wg@external.juniper.net
>http://external.juniper.net/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg