The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] MPLS and fragmentation...
--On Wednesday, December 13, 2000 03:08:25 PM -0800 Ben Black
<ben@layer8.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 05:42:45PM -0500, Krishnan, Vijay G. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I understand that the RSVP-TE finds the path MTU of an LSP based on the
>> minimum MTU size of the router interfaces on the path. The source
>> (ingress LSR or LER) can send the packets with this size to avoid
>> fragmentation. Can the packet size overshoot the path MTU due to
>> addition of labels (hierarchical tunnels or something) on its path,
>> which might require fragmentation?
>>
>
> The MTU determined should take into account whatever the depth of the
> label stack actually is for the given LSP. Fragmentation is not avoided,
> it is simply done, if required, outside the MPLS domain.
It would seem to me that fragmentation must occur inside of the MPLS domain
becuase if it didn't, why would the LSR MIB we have the following object,
instantiated on all MPLS interfaces:
mplsInterfaceOutFragments OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object counts the number of outgoing MPLS
packets that required fragmentation before
transmission on this interface. This object
MUST count on a per-interface basis regardless of
which label space the interface participates in."
::= { mplsInterfacePerfEntry 4 }
-dbf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\\\|///
\\ _ _ //
( @ @ )
+-------------oOQo-(_)-oQOo----------+
| +----------+ |
| | __ __ | David Fiore |
| | | \ / | | Staff Engineer |
| | | \/ | | Micromuse Corp. |
| | | |\/| | | |
| | | | | | | 914.747.7630 (o) |
| | +-+ +-+ | |
| +----------+ david@micromuse.com |
+----------------------Oooo----------+
oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
|
|