The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] Fw: MPLS and CAC
Of course overbooking is a poor man's substitute for calculating the equivalent capacity of the traffic that is passing through the tunnel. Nevertheless, overbooking is commonly used and people like it (for many reasons). Bora ----- Original Message ----- From: "Curtis Villamizar" <curtis@avici.com> To: "Erickson Trejo-Reyes" <eenet@electeng.leeds.ac.uk> Cc: <curtis@avici.com>; <david.charlap@marconi.com>; <mpls@UU.NET> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 6:48 PM Subject: Re: Fw: MPLS and CAC > > In message <01c01130$842fc740$dbb00b81@default.leeds.ac.uk>, "Erickson Trejo-Re > yes" writes: > > > > By overbooking you mean that, for example, if a voice source can be = > > treated as a VBR source with 64 KB peak bit rate and activity factor of = > > 0.4, then the reservation should be made to a higher value than the = > > computed effective bandwidth (and obviously higher than the average bit = > > rate of 0.4 times 64KB)? > > I meant that the allowable sum of reservations could greatly exceed > the desireable sum of reservations. The ingress would have to be > smart enough to lay out trafffic such that load was well distributed > and was far below the values where CAC would limit the sum of > reservations. > > > I had thought that, if an MPLS node is due to use only certain = > > percentage of its total capacity to serve, for example, guaranteed = > > services, it would not be too harmful to make reservations (up to the = > > available percentage) only based on the sustained rate, with the only = > > possible consequence of temporary squeezing the throughput of = > > best-effort services. Comments? > > Instead of limiting the guaranteed services to 30% by setting the > reservable bandwidth very low, the ingress can be configured to avoid > any links which are approaching or have over 30% guaranteed service. > Right now the only way to know that it is guaranteed service and now > BE is to give then different holding priorities but that is changing. > > Curtis
|
|