The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] French eng. student having questions
Hi !
As a French Engineering student leading my end-of-studies project on MPLS, I
have read several relevant internet draft, RFCs and some white papers.
Consequently, I need some explanatory statements to understand MPLS concepts as
well as possible. If you have some time to answer few questions, I will be very
grateful to you.
I am aware that some of theses questions may appear naive to you, however any
help is very welcome.
1/ referring to draft-ietf-mpls-arch06.txt.
I have understood the label stacking (3.9) and tunnels (3.27) concepts, but
maybe you could give me an example of application and illustrate "Sometimes a
router Ru takes explicit action to cause a particular packet to be delivered to
another router Rd, even though Ru and Rd are not consecutive routers on the
Hop-by-hop path for that packet" (3.27)
2/ referring to draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext05.txt and also to Avici Systems White
paper : "Traffic Engineering with MPLS" published on 03/16/00
Label inferred LSP (L-LSP) can be potentially excessively resource consuming
since each LSR needs a mapping of each of the 64 possible DCSP values with a
label.
Even Avici WP says: "This method requires than an association of specific
DiffServ codepoints to LSPs be pre-established prior to traffic flow" :
Does it mean that, for each ELSR pair (say ELSR A and B ), 64 different LSPs are
pre-established, and consequently at least 64 labels are reserved on each LSR on
the path between A and B?
3/ I would like to know where to find MPLS CoS definitions.
4/ Concerning the Forward Equivalent Class (FEC) concept, that I do not feel
tangible.
Is it right to say that a FEC is mapped on an LSP at an ingress LSR?
Has a FEC a local or global significance?
Two "more open" questions:
5/ Despite draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext05.txt, I have some difficulties to see the
developments achieved to tackle "QoS management through adjacent networks"
What could you say about the two following scenari (and others we can easily
imagine)?
A/
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
| | | | | |
| non MPLS | | MPLS | | non MPLS |
| network |-----| Network |-------| network |
| Inserv | | DiffServ | | Inteserv |
| | | | | |
------------------- ----------------- ------------------
B/
------------ ------------ ----------------
| | | | | |
| non MPLS | | MPLS | | non MPLS |
| network |--------| Network |-------| network |
| DiffServ | | Int serv | | Diffserv |
| | | | | |
------------------- ---------------- --------------------
6/ MPLS over satellite.
Has it be ever considered?
Briefly, may high bandwidth-delay-factor links hamper MPLS working properly.
What issues and adaptation do you see when evocating MPLS over satellite?
I really thank you for your reading and your help.
Sincerely,
Carl Creange.
Institut National des Télécommunications - FRANCE
|
|