The MPLS WG Archive[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Subject Index] resource preemption
Hi Folks, >John , > >The resv message doesn't contain session attribute object and hence you >don't know the setup and holding priorities of the LSP. These are available >in the path message and hence Call admission should be done during path >message. In any case, Once your LSP is 'setuped', the setup priority doesn't have any meaning. And the only priority which will be used is the holding priority. A quick question. If you are implementing RFC2212 i.e GS, how would you accomodate R, if R > r. Considering that you would have already accepted the session while processing the Path message. Anyway, Read RFC2209 and get the first hand info on RSVP message processing. Have a nice weekend. Over & out. Navin > >When there is not enough resources available to support the LSP, you can >find out how much is allocated to lower priority LSPs and based on that you >can generate the AdSepc. These lower priority must be preempted only when >you get the resv message. > >-sundara > >-----Original Message----- >From: John Sparr [mailto:johnrdb@yahoo.com] >Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 11:18 AM >To: Navin >Cc: mpls@UU.NET >Subject: RE: resource preemption > > >Hi Navin, > >It should be that Resv message triggers this compare. >But why the draft says "When a path message is >considered for admission"?(section 4.8.3) It seems >when a node received a Path message it checks if the >bandwidth is avialable. I think the bandwidth request >should be in Resv message. is that right? > > >Regards, >John > >--- Navin <navin@empowertel.com> wrote: >> Hi There, >> >> First of all, you carry out admission control check >> while >> processing the RESV message NOT PATH message. >> >> Secondly, admission control check will be done at >> all the nodes >> EXCEPT the receiver node as there you really don't >> reserve >> anything. >> >> Hope this helps, >> >> Cheers, >> Navin >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On >> Behalf Of John >> Sparr >> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 9:30 AM >> To: mpls@UU.NET >> Subject: resource preemption >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Quick question on resource preemption from RSVP-TE. >> >> In section 4.8.3, it says when a new Path message is >> considered for admission, the bandwidth requested is >> compared with the bandwidth at the priority >> specified >> in the Setup Priority. >> >> My question is who will do this compare, >> intermidiate >> nodes or receiver? >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> John >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. >> http://invites.yahoo.com/ > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. >http://invites.yahoo.com/
|
|