The MPLS WG Archive

[Adrian Farrel <AF@datcon.co.uk>]

Andi,

Yes, I proposed this (with some suggested ASN.1) on Jan 7th and again
requested it on Mar 20th.

Tom says that he and the other authors are looking at this point together
with some of the other issues that I raised.  It has probably got a bit
buried under the Flurry of activity around the LSR MIB.

Tom, any news?

Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Farrel  mailto:af@datcon.co.uk
Network Convergence Group
Data Connection Ltd., Chester, UK
http://www.datcon.co.uk/
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 313440  Fax: +44 (0) 1244 312422


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Abes, Andi [mailto:aabes@quarrytech.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 9:51 PM
>To: MPLS mailing list
>Subject: LSPID as ER Hop in TE-MIB 
>
>
>Hi 
>I'm not sure, but I think there was a discussion about this - having an
>explicit
>hop specified as an LSPID - I couldn't find in my mailing list archive
>Is this going to be supported ??
>
>Let me also add another twist to this -
>If the ER hop is used to specify the local interface, this 
>kind of an object
>
>will allow initiating a "stacked" label. I'm not aware of 
>having any other 
>way of specifying such a thing.
>
>
>Thanx,
>Andi.
>
>